Having IRS problems?
Has the IRS obtained a Grand Jury Indictment against you?
Do you know what your Civil Rights are?
How do you protect your Rights from these Monsters?
Sample notice from the IRS of a Grand Jury Indictment against a Private Citizen:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Plaintiff)
JOHN DOE (Defendant)
Fraud is being committed by the IRS, the Judge, and all Agents involved with this format!
How can this be?
The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and the IRS are CORPORATIONS! A corporation is a dead entity; it’s just a piece of paper! It cannot read, write, or talk. There needs to be a living man or woman who represents and acts for that piece of paper. It’s a living man or woman who needs to do the thinking, the decision-making, and execution of those decisions regarding the “entity, the piece of paper called a CORPORATION.”
The only way a Corporation can sue a Private Citizen is by its Agents, and then only with the Agents taking “Full Commercial Liability.” (Agents must be “Commercially Bonded,” insured, in case they violate any Citizen’s Civil Rights; thus, the Private Citizen may obtain financial reward by “Redress of Grievances” from these Agents’ Civil Rights Damages)
This is where the “Constitutional Criminal Complaints” come in, which I have Freely offered to teach groups of Citizens wishing to learn to protect their Rights and have enough Good Will to be willing to teach others in need; otherwise, don’t waste my time.
So how has the IRS committed Fraud by formatting the claim against the Private Citizen as:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Plaintiff)
JOHN DOE (Defendant)
Since it is the Agents (the live flesh and blood) of a CORPORATION (a piece of paper) who must be the ones who actually bring suit, this claim must be titled as the following, listing each individual accuser/IRS agent by name:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel by (Plaintiff/accusers)
IRS Agent #1 Upper Lower Case Name
IRS Agent #2 Upper Lower Case Name
A criminal case brought in behalf of the peace and dignity of the state:
A. has been brought ex rel (by) accusers, that is, "on the telling or relation/story of the accuser" with the accusation being told /(related) to the prosecuting attorney
by the accuser,
B. has named the accuser in the setting of the case, and
C. contains the signed and notarized affidavit of the accuser in the body of the
What part of the Constitution demands this? (Constitution Article IV Section I, “Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state.” People need to learn that Full Faith and Credit means by Notary Seal and Certification, so there is someone taking liability under Sworn or Affirmation of Oath that the paperwork they’re presenting, the “message, the facts they’re stating” have someone willing to testify to the authenticity – the truth as they know it, to be true!!! THIS is a missing link, a missing component, in all actions brought on in the name of CORPORATION law suits today.)
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
Right to be confronted by witnesses (accusers) against him/her!
How can a Private citizen cross-examine a CORPORATION?
This is why, to be a Legal case against the Flesh and Blood Citizen, it must be brought “ex rel by” the Flesh and Blood accusers, who are willing to place their Blood Oath signature on the dotted line taking “Full Commercial Liability” for their claims against the Private Individual.
How many IRS Agents do you personally know who are willing to take “Full Commercial Liability” by signing with Blood Oath (i.e., a blue, wet-ink signature, and sealed with their red-ink thumbprint) on the dotted line? I have not met one yet.
Review any letters, which you have received from the IRS - either by an Agent or even unsigned. Have you seen any Agent sign with Blood Oath taking "Full Commercial Liability” naming their Bonding Company and Bond number?
What Federal Civil Rights laws back up these Criminal Violations of our Rights?
18 USC § 3: Accessory after the fact
18 USC § 4 Misprision of Felony
18 USC § 241 Conspiracy Against Rights
18 USC § 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
18 USC § 1001 Statements or Entries Generally
18 USC § 1621 Perjury Generally
18 USC § 1622 Subornation of Perjury
42 USC § 1986 Action for Neglect to Prevent
The Glass House Doctrine
It is the executive branch, which ultimately commits the statutory processes of enforcement, which the legislative and judicative branches order up for the control and punishment of citizens.
"A person who lives in a glass house should not throw rocks at others." (sic)
Likewise a government infested with malfeasant officials, officers and clerks is in no position to pursue felons in the public sphere.
If it would be credible in the eyes of the public and the bonding companies, then it must first eliminate its own malfeasance with the same diligence that it would pursue the civilian felon.
1. Defendant has not yet exhausted all of his Remedies in Commerce and therefore the parties of this case cannot use public tax money to do battle in the courts!
(Constitution for the United States of America, 5th Amendment)
A. The IRS Agents have not disclosed the name of their Bonding Company or bonding number to do business as a Debt Collector.
B. No Federal Tax liens have been filed in this matter.
C. “Notices” are not liens: “Notice of Federal Tax Lien”
2. Defendant reserves the right to amend this document if necessary, in order that the truth be more fully ascertained and justly determined.
3. I believe the cited Accusers are violating my Rights of Due Process which is a Criminal action. Therefore my filing of this Challenge of the Court’s Jurisdiction is mandated by 18 USC § 4.
4. Plaintiff and agents have not personally signed with a Wet-Ink Signature under sworn Affidavit certifying that their Testimony (claims against my person) are True, Correct, Complete, and Not Misleading. Their action is Fraud, predicated upon Violation of Due Process of Law. The Judge of the court is a party to this Fraud by allowing it to be perpetrated in the Judge’s Court. (Title 18 USC § 3- 4 & 241)
Points of Law: 18 USC §§ 3 & 4, 18 USC §§ 241 & 242, 42USC 1986
End of sample.
Randy Due (Civil Rights Advocate)