The Constitution - The 9-12 Project of Central PA2024-03-29T01:40:19Zhttps://wesurroundthemcentrecounty.ning.com/forum/categories/the-constitution/listForCategory?categoryId=3029713%3ACategory%3A8637&feed=yes&xn_auth=noSolemn Recognition of Mixed Wartag:wesurroundthemcentrecounty.ning.com,2013-05-31:3029713:Topic:498772013-05-31T15:22:05.156ZRandy Duehttps://wesurroundthemcentrecounty.ning.com/profile/RandyDue
<p>Middle District of Georgia’s Albany office</p>
<p>U.S. Probation office</p>
<p><b> </b></p>
<p><b>Attn: Scott Howell</b>, case supervisor for Troy Greve in Case No 8:12CR344 Phone: 229/903-1263 May 30, 2013</p>
<h1>FAX: 229/430-8537</h1>
<p align="left"> </p>
<p align="left">State of <i>Georgia</i> )</p>
<p align="left"> )…</p>
<p>Middle District of Georgia’s Albany office</p>
<p>U.S. Probation office</p>
<p><b> </b></p>
<p><b>Attn: Scott Howell</b>, case supervisor for Troy Greve in Case No 8:12CR344 Phone: 229/903-1263 May 30, 2013</p>
<h1>FAX: 229/430-8537</h1>
<p align="left"> </p>
<p align="left">State of <i>Georgia</i> )</p>
<p align="left"> ) ss.</p>
<p>County of ___________ )</p>
<p> </p>
<p>SOLEMN RECOGNITION OF MIXED WAR</p>
<p>(A Declaration of Independence)</p>
<p>From now on it is all business</p>
<p> in the Nature of two combatants, toe-to-toe, muskets in the mouth.</p>
<p>(“And ye shall know the Truth, and the Truth shall make you Free”. –Jesus –John 8:32)</p>
<p align="left"> </p>
<p><b>I, Affiant, Randall David Due, Public Minister, acting in my own proper person, certify under my own <u>commercial liability,</u> that the following is true, correct, materially complete, and not misleading to the best of my knowledge and belief.</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p>COMMUNICATION NOTICE</p>
<p align="center"><b><u>FULL DISCLOSURE</u></b></p>
<p align="center"><b><u>DUE PROCESS OF LAW</u></b></p>
<p align="center"><b><u>MANDATED BY THE CONSTITUTION FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA</u></b></p>
<p align="center"><b><u>AND THE LAWS PURSUANT THERETO</u></b></p>
<p align="center"><b><u> </u></b></p>
<p><b>AM6/INFO (Nature and Cause of Accusation), AM14.1/EP (Equal Protection of the Law)</b> --I may require as much from a Judge and/or any other court officer and/or agent of the government as this Nation and its Constitution have required and gotten from me.</p>
<p align="center"> </p>
<p>SEE ANNEXED: DEMAND FOR CERTIFIED COPIES OF REQUIRED CONSTITUTIONAL OATHS AND BONDING AND/OR PUBLIC OFFICIAL LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICIES</p>
<p><b> </b></p>
<p>I, Randall David Due, demand “Full Disclosure” from you, Scott Howell, of your required Constitutional Oath of office, equivalent to the Oath of Induction into the Military to “support and Defend this Nation and its Constitution for the United States of America against all enemies foreign and domestic”, and the “Full Disclosure” of your Bonding and/or Public Official Liability Insurance policies, for Identification of your person and Duties and Responsibilities, so that I may discover who you are and who you claim to be, and that you have adequate <b><u>Commercial Liability</u></b> <b><u>Coverage</u></b> for any Civil Rights Damages I feel and/or believe that you might be involved in as Principal or Accessory Accomplice in violation of my Civil Rights, relative to the following US Codes:18 USC §§ 2, 3, 4, 241, 242, 2381, 2382, 2383 & others.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Should you, Scott Howell, have any communication you wish to present to me, I demand, pursuant to the 5<sup>th</sup>, 6<sup>th</sup> and 14<sup>th</sup> Amendments, that you do so by Affidavit sworn to be true, correct, complete, and not misleading under your own Commercial Liability.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Also any other government officer or their agency parties, who expect to achieve any meaningful communication with me must do so by Affidavit sworn to be true, correct, complete and not misleading under their own Commercial Liability.</p>
<p> </p>
<p align="center"><b>Casual Communication will be regarded as deliberately evasionary.</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Anything less than this, such as casual communication, will be construed to be evidence of a Direct <b>“Patent Evasion”</b> of <b>“Full Disclosure”, also known as “Fraud”,</b> a violation of my rights of <b>“Due Process of Law”,</b> a violation of Article IV section 1 of the Constitution for the United States of America, a violation of my 5<sup>th</sup> and 14<sup>th</sup> Amendment rights of “Due Process of Law”, and a violation of my Civil Rights, 18 USC §§ 241 & 242.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Affiant(s) exercise the right to amend this and/or any other document if necessary, in order that the truth be more fully and certainly ascertained and justly determined.</p>
<p><i>Affiant,</i> Randall David Due<i>,</i> <i>in the Flesh and Blood in Proper Person,</i> do not consent to be an accessory party to Fraud (18 USC §§ 2, 3 & 4) and/or violation of my <b>certain un-a-lien-able Rights endowed by my Creator and secured by the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and by our soldiers who swear an Oath to defend this Nation and its Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.</b> Further more, I reserve all of my Rights using the UCC 1-308 (Performance or Acceptance under Reservation of Rights) in relationship to any past and or future action concerning this case. Notice is hereby given. <b>Fraud vitiates all Contracts and is grounds for reversal of all Legal Faults.</b></p>
<p><b> </b></p>
<p><b>Randall David Due aka Randy Due, <u>Public Minister</u>;</b> Ex. Military (Civil Rights Advocate) acting as a Non-union Lawyer (not a member of the bar association) pursuant to 42 USC § 1986 (acting with Reasonable Diligence) & 18 USC § 4 (Mandate to act), 18 USC §§ 241 & 242 (Protection of the Nation, its Constitution and Civil Rights)</p>
<p><b>Public Minister</b> pursuant to and protected by Public Law 94-583, Oct. 21, 1976 Stat. 2891 [Codified in Title 28 U.S.C § 1602 et esq.]; and Public Law 1790, 1 Stat. At L. 117, Ch 9 [Codified in 22 U.S.C. § 252]; Public Law 1948, Ch 645, 62 Stat. 688 [Codified in Title 18 U.S.C § 112] and Public Law 1871, Ch 22, § 6, 17 Stat. 15; [Codified in 42 U.S.C. § 1986]</p>
<p> </p>
<p>179 Green St. E. Pelham, Georgia 31779</p>
<p><b>Phone:</b> (229) 294-6112; <b>FAX:</b> (229) 294-4594 <a href="mailto:duze24@bellsouth.net">duze24@bellsouth.net</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal; Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Executed this ______ day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand thirteen.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> By: __________________________________</p>
<p> (Signature of Affiant, Public Minister “Without Recourse”)</p>
<p> </p>
<p align="left">Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this ______day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand thirteen by Randall David Due.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>__ Personally Known__ Produced Identification Type and # of ID______________________</p>
<p> </p>
<p> _______________________________</p>
<p> (Signature of Notary)</p>
<p>(Seal)</p>
<p> ________________________________</p>
<p> (Name of Notary Typed, Stamped, or Printed)</p>
<p> Notary Public, State of _________________</p> MARKETING OF LIENS AGAINST PUBLIC OFFICIALS FOR DEBT COLLECTIONtag:wesurroundthemcentrecounty.ning.com,2013-05-24:3029713:Topic:495862013-05-24T16:55:48.488ZRandy Duehttps://wesurroundthemcentrecounty.ning.com/profile/RandyDue
<p>MARKETING OF LIENS AGAINST PUBLIC OFFICIALS FOR DEBT COLLECTION</p>
<p> </p>
<p><br></br>On May 23, 2013, at 8:59 PM, "Randy Due" <<a href="mailto:duze24@bellsouth.net">duze24@bellsouth.net</a>> wrote to:</p>
<p>John Ouirk,</p>
<p>Asset Location & Recovery International Inc.<br></br>160 W. Camino Real, Suite 119<br></br>Boca Raton, FL 33432<br></br>Tel: (561) 305-7822 (cell)<br></br>Tel: (561) 703-3671<br></br>Fax: (561) 417-0099…<br></br></p>
<p>MARKETING OF LIENS AGAINST PUBLIC OFFICIALS FOR DEBT COLLECTION</p>
<p> </p>
<p><br/>On May 23, 2013, at 8:59 PM, "Randy Due" <<a href="mailto:duze24@bellsouth.net">duze24@bellsouth.net</a>> wrote to:</p>
<p>John Ouirk,</p>
<p>Asset Location & Recovery International Inc.<br/>160 W. Camino Real, Suite 119<br/>Boca Raton, FL 33432<br/>Tel: (561) 305-7822 (cell)<br/>Tel: (561) 703-3671<br/>Fax: (561) 417-0099<br/><a href="http://www.assetlocationinternational.com">www.assetlocationinternational.com</a></p>
<p> Can you put me in touch with some country outside of the United States, which would be reasonable to work with, that we can file these Liens against our Corrupt Public Officials? Then sell these Liens on Dutch auction and let foreign countries collect by offsetting their trade defecit with the USA.</p>
<p>The Public officials do not want to obey their own laws and we do not have enough people yet, who are willing to stand up and make collections against these Public officials and their employer. (Federal Reserve)</p>
<p>We have decided that if people in this country are not going to stand up against this Rebellion, Insurrection and Treason by our own Public Officials, then we must use some foreign country to punish these Public officials. </p>
<p>There comes a time when one must do what one must do. </p>
<p><b>I love America, but if the Public Officials are not going to protect Citizen's Civil Rights, then it isn't America anymore and the world needs to know this and realize the <u>Public Officials of America are two-faced Liars</u>.</b></p>
<p><b> </b></p>
<p><b>Randall David Due aka Randy Due, <u>Public Minister</u>;</b> Ex. Military (Civil Rights Advocate) acting as a Non-union Lawyer (not a member of the bar association) pursuant to 42 USC § 1986 (acting with Reasonable Diligence) & 18 USC § 4 (Mandate to act), 18 USC §§ 241 & 242 (Protection of the Nation, its Constitution and Civil Rights)</p>
<p><b>Public Minister</b> pursuant to and protected by Public Law 94-583, Oct. 21, 1976 Stat. 2891 [Codified in Title 28 U.S.C § 1602 et esq.]; and Public Law 1790, 1 Stat. At L. 117, Ch 9 [Codified in 22 U.S.C. § 252]; Public Law 1948, Ch 645, 62 Stat. 688 [Codified in Title 18 U.S.C § 112] and Public Law 1871, Ch 22, § 6, 17 Stat. 15; [Codified in 42 U.S.C. § 1986]</p>
<p> </p>
<p>179 Green St. E.</p>
<p>Pelham, Georgia 31779</p>
<p>Phone: (229) 294-6112 <a href="mailto:duze24@bellsouth.net">duze24@bellsouth.net</a></p>
<p>Fax: (229) 294-4594</p> Judicial Fraud --Coercion and Duresstag:wesurroundthemcentrecounty.ning.com,2013-05-23:3029713:Topic:496732013-05-23T20:45:32.677ZRandy Duehttps://wesurroundthemcentrecounty.ning.com/profile/RandyDue
<p align="center">TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA</p>
<p> </p>
<p>State of <i>Georgia</i> )</p>
<p> ) ss.</p>
<p>County of ___________ )</p>
<p> </p>
<p><b><u>Notice to Clerk of Court</u>:</b> Return a copy of this document showing it has been <u>Time stamped, dated, and filed, with filing number recorded into the Court Records</u>. (18 USC § 3)</p>
<p> </p>
<p> …</p>
<p align="center">TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA</p>
<p> </p>
<p>State of <i>Georgia</i> )</p>
<p> ) ss.</p>
<p>County of ___________ )</p>
<p> </p>
<p><b><u>Notice to Clerk of Court</u>:</b> Return a copy of this document showing it has been <u>Time stamped, dated, and filed, with filing number recorded into the Court Records</u>. (18 USC § 3)</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody><tr><td valign="top" width="348"><p>UNITED STATES OF AMERICA </p>
<p align="center">(Plaintiff)</p>
<p>vs.</p>
<div><p> RANDALL DAVID DUE</p>
<p> (Defendant/Affiant)</p>
</div>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="20"><p>)</p>
<p>)</p>
<p>)</p>
<p>)</p>
<p>)</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="263"><p align="center"><b><u>8:12CR344</u></b></p>
<p align="center"> </p>
<h3>JUDICIAL FRAUD IN AND UPON THE COURT</h3>
<p>JUDICIAL DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS OF LAW</p>
<p>JUDICIAL VIOLATION OF MY CIVIL RIGHTS</p>
<p>Concerning the Conditional Release</p>
<p align="center"> </p>
<p align="center"> </p>
<p align="center"> </p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h5 align="left"> </h5>
<h1><u>AFFIDAVIT OF MATERIAL FACTS</u></h1>
<p> </p>
<p><b>I, Affiant, Randall David Due, Public Minister, acting in my own proper person, certify under my own <u>commercial liability,</u> that the following is true, correct, materially complete, and not misleading to the best of my knowledge and belief.</b></p>
<h5>COERCION AND DURESS</h5>
<p>>1. On April 10, 2013, United States Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken engaged in <b>Coercion and Duress</b> by requiring me, Randall David Due, to sign under <b><u>Coercion and Duress</u></b> a conditional release contract, which imposed upon me violation of my Constitutionally guaranteed Natural and Civil Rights.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>>2. I, Randall David Due, asked Mr. Thalken, approximately, “if I sign the conditional release, would this mean that I would be allowed to go back to Georgia and receive all of the Medical Treatment, which I need, and which is being denied to me in jail?” Mr. Thalken replied, “Yes”.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>>3. Then I asked Mr. Thalken, approximately, “if I refuse to sign the conditional release, would this cause me to remain in jail?” Mr. Thalken replied, something to the effect that, more than likely I would remain in jail.</p>
<h5>DOMICILE AND COMMUNITY</h5>
<p>>4. I have had, and have, an established home and family domiciled in the same place and address for twenty-six years.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>>5. I have never been convicted of any crimes. My children have never been convicted of any crimes.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>>6. The court officers have not proven that I, Randall David Due, am a threat to any person in the community or a danger to the community.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<h5>NO FLIGHT RISK</h5>
<p>>7. I am not a flight risk and there is no reason to believe that I would be a flight risk. My life’s work stands as proof for all to witness that I do not walk away from problems; I am recognized as a Public Minister because I walk or run toward problems with the intent to solve them, just as this Affidavit proves.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>>8. I, Randall David Due, have acted as a Public Minister for many years as a Civil Rights Advocate, helping my fellow countrymen in various ways with free information and assisting them to protect their Civil Rights as secured by the Constitution for the United States of America. This is “Patently Evident” by doing a web search of my name, Randall David Due aka Randy Due, as well as my web handle, Duzey and Moreless.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>>9. I have been very open in my actions of helping my fellow countrymen to protect their Constitutionally Protected Civil Rights. All that any public official needs to do to locate me is to call me at my home phone number or come to my house address, which I have posted all over the internet along with my legal and political postings.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>>10. I feel and believe that the conditions of the release contract restricting my freedom of communication and association with other people is a direct violation of my Rights under the First Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America, the “Due Process of Law”, and my Civil Rights and Civil and Criminal Responsibilities under 42 USC § 1986, 18 USC § 4, 18 USC § 241 & 18 USC § 242, -- especially in the case of those who have requested or demanded my help and who have granted to me a “Power of Attorney” to assist them as a Public Minister/Civil Rights Advocate in protecting their “Civil Rights”, and/or anyone else who needs my help in guaranteeing the Constitutional Protection of their Civil Rights.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>>11. Requiring me to report to a Pretrial Services Officer and comply with their directives when there is no lawful or personal history grounds for it, is disrespect, personal insult and a violation of my Civil Rights, specifically a violation of my Third Amendment Rights against Quartering Soldiers in my house without my “CONSENT”.</p>
<h5>THE ASSAULT</h5>
<p>>12. The 4<sup>th</sup> Amendment states that government officers cannot violate my person, houses, papers, and effects, without a sworn affidavit.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>>13. The FBI Agents and their Accessory Law Enforcement Accomplices had absolutely no justification or grounds to use a Trick and Ruse to get me outside of my home, except to exercise excessive force by assaulting, tasering and kidnapping me, as the Prosecuting Attorney has already admitted on the Public Court Record was done to me.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>>14. The Judges, Court Officers, FBI Agents and their Accessory Law Enforcement Accomplices have been and are being Brutal toward me because I have found a way to hold them Publicly accountable for their Criminal Behavior toward my fellow countrymen, the Public.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>>15. Picture this: What can happen to one can happen to all. If they can capriciously descend upon me and violate my Civil Rights as secured by the Constitution for the United States and laws pursuant thereto, what is to stop them from doing the same thing to you, the reader?</p>
<h5>PORTRAYING Randall David Due AS A CRIMINAL</h5>
<p>>16. The FBI Agents and Accessory Law Enforcement Accomplices have <b><u>portrayed me as a Criminal.</u></b> That portrayal of me has been both Libel and Slander. They have disrespected my Responsible Constitutional Services as a Public Minister provided pursuant to 42 USC §1986 and 18 USC §§ 4, 241 & 242 because it holds Public Officials accountable for their Criminal Behavior. U. S. Law “Mandates” that I report their Criminal behavior to some Judge or other person in Civil or Military Authority.</p>
<p align="center"> </p>
<p>>17. I do not feel or believe that any of the people that I associate with, or communicate with have filed any “false liens or spurious civil actions” against judges or law enforcement officials, and furthermore, I do not know of any Judges or Law enforcement officials who have proven that anyone has filed “false liens or spurious civil actions” against them. But, even more important, as a Public Minister I ask, “Shall attorneys and Lawyers be portrayed as Criminals, just because their clients are Criminals?” “Shall a doctor only associate with people who are well”? <b>Before you charge someone else,</b> <b><u>consider your own associations</u>. That is why an indictment is called a <u>Libel</u> in Scotch Law.</b> See Black’s Law Dictionary 4<sup>th</sup> Revised Edition Page 1060, <b><u>Libel,</u></b> third paragraph. <b><u>Libels</u></b> are of two kinds in Scotch Law, namely Indictments and Criminal Letters. Indictments and Criminal Letters presented by a government officer must be bonded to protect the Public from the awesome power of the government, especially when its officers are corrupt and self-serving or serving a superior malevolent political structure.</p>
<h5>POLITICAL IMMUNITY OF A PUBLIC MINISTER</h5>
<p>>18. Article I section 6 of the Constitution for the United States of America states:</p>
<p> “The senators and representatives… shall in all cases, except treason, felony, and breach of peace, be privileged from arrest during their attendance at the session of their respective houses, and in going to and returning from the same, and for speech or debate in either house, they shall not be questioned in any other place”.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>>19. Because of my long–term dedicated work as a Public Minister/Civil Rights Advocate I have earned and am granted thereby and have political immunity from violation of my political rights. In other words my actions as a Public Minister/Civil Rights Advocate must be respected.</p>
<p>If it is not true that functioning as a Public Minister/Civil Rights Advocate has given me political immunity from violation of my political rights, then each, and every active Congressman can be tasered, thrown to the ground and kidnapped by the FBI and/or any other Law Enforcement Officials when they see fit so to do, as it was done to me; for what can happen to one can happen to all.</p>
<p align="center"> </p>
<p> >20. I am fully aware of the fact that I am being Politically Prosecuted and Persecuted because that is the retaliation and un-lawful penalty for exposing the Corruption of Public Officials in the government as I am “Mandated” to do by 18 USC § 4. You can contact any person that I have worked with or worked for, if you need a witness to the Criminal Behavior of Public Officials.</p>
<h5>CONCLUSION</h5>
<p>>21. Denying me the right to contact, and/or serve paper processes on any Public Official whom I feel or believe has violated my and/or any Citizen’s Civil Rights is a violation of “Due Process of Law”. This is especially true when they deny me the right to present a process to the U.S. Marshals, whom seem to be the only remaining decent and honorable Law enforcement officers in the United States Justice system.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>>22. The ruling by any Judge and/or other court officer that Criminal Complaints, filed in the United States Courts against Public Officials pursuant to Criminal Law 18 USC §§ 4, 241 & 242 are civil actions, is a Judicial act of Forgery, Fraud and Falsification of Documents and other legal processes under color of law.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>>23. I feel and believe that the <u>order setting conditions of release</u> contract restricting me from entering any courthouse and/or filing any documents or actions, which I deem necessary to my self-defense and the protection of my and/or my fellow countrymen’s Civil Rights, is a Constitutional violation of the “Due Process of Law” and a violation of my Civil Rights, 1<sup>st</sup>, 5<sup>th</sup>, 9<sup>th</sup> and 14<sup>th</sup> Amendment violations.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>>24. I <b><u>know</u></b> that I signed the annexed “conditional release” under <b><u>Coercion and Duress</u>, in order to be able to have the necessary Medical surgery to save my Life and I know that I have a Positive Legal and Lawful and Commercial Claim against all Public Officials and Accessory Accomplices who have imposed this coercion and duress upon me. It’s money in the <u>Public Bank of Justice</u>.</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p>>25. I, Randall David Due, under-signed my signature with the citation of UCC 1-308, thus reserving all my God given and Civil Rights as secured by the Constitution for the United States of America and the Laws pursuant thereto.</p>
<p> </p>
<p align="center"><b><u>NOTICE TO ALL PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND COURT OFFICERS</u></b></p>
<p align="center"><b><u> </u></b></p>
<p><b>Should you disagree with or contest any part of this <u>Affidavit</u>, you must immediately show, by an Affidavit sworn to be true, correct, materially complete and not misleading under your own Commercial Liability, your specific “Just Cause” of Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law to support your contesting of this Affidavit.</b></p>
<p><b> </b></p>
<p><b>Failure or refusal to “Contest” this Affidavit shall be construed to mean that you are in total agreement with all points of this Affidavit.</b></p>
<p><b> </b></p>
<p><b><u>See annexed Exhibit A: ORDER SETTING CONDITIONS OF RELEASE --3 pages</u></b></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Affiant(s) exercise the right to amend this and/or any other document if necessary, in order that the truth be more fully and certainly ascertained and justly determined.</p>
<p><i>Affiant,</i> Randall David Due<i>,</i> <i>in the Flesh and Blood in Proper Person,</i> do not consent to be an accessory party to Fraud (18 USC §§ 2, 3 & 4) and/or violation of my <b>certain un-a-lien-able Rights endowed by my Creator and secured by the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and by our soldiers who swear an Oath to defend this Nation and its Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.</b> Further more, I reserve all of my Rights using the UCC 1-308 (Performance or Acceptance under Reservation of Rights) in relationship to any past and or future action concerning this case. Notice is hereby given. <b>Fraud vitiates all Contracts and is grounds for reversal of all Legal Faults.</b></p>
<p><b> </b></p>
<p><b>Public Minister</b> pursuant to and protected by Public Law 94-583, Oct. 21, 1976 Stat. 2891 [Codified in Title 28 U.S.C § 1602 et esq.]; and Public Law 1790, 1 Stat. At L. 117, Ch 9 [Codified in 22 U.S.C. § 252]; Public Law 1948, Ch 645, 62 Stat. 688 [Codified in Title 18 U.S.C § 112] and Public Law 1871, Ch 22, § 6, 17 Stat. 15; [Codified in 42 U.S.C. § 1986]</p>
<p> </p>
<p align="center"><b>Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal; Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Executed this ______ day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand thirteen.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> By: __________________________________</p>
<p> (Signature of Affiant, Public Minister “Under Duress”)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this ______day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand thirteen by Randall David Due.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>__ Personally Known__ Produced Identification Type and # of ID______________________</p>
<p> </p>
<p> _______________________________</p>
<p> (Signature of Notary)</p>
<p>(Seal)</p>
<p> ________________________________</p>
<p> (Name of Notary Typed, Stamped, or Printed)</p>
<p> Notary Public, State of _________________</p>
<h1 align="left"> </h1>
<h1 align="left">CC: to Congressmen of the USA and others</h1> FAX Letter to Bankstag:wesurroundthemcentrecounty.ning.com,2013-02-25:3029713:Topic:488972013-02-25T01:40:59.934ZRandy Duehttps://wesurroundthemcentrecounty.ning.com/profile/RandyDue
<p>FAX COVER LETTER</p>
<p><b>ATTENTION: February 24, 2013</b></p>
<p>Wells Fargo Bank Bank Manager --Courtney R.Morgan</p>
<p>P.O. Box 930 Phone= 308-762-5302</p>
<p>Alliance, NE 69301 <b>Fax =308-762-5314</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p>First National Bank of North Platte Bank President -- John…</p>
<p>FAX COVER LETTER</p>
<p><b>ATTENTION: February 24, 2013</b></p>
<p>Wells Fargo Bank Bank Manager --Courtney R.Morgan</p>
<p>P.O. Box 930 Phone= 308-762-5302</p>
<p>Alliance, NE 69301 <b>Fax =308-762-5314</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p>First National Bank of North Platte Bank President -- John McGhehey</p>
<p>124 West 3<sup>rd</sup> Street Phone =308-763-2100</p>
<p>Alliance, NE 6930l <b>Fax = 308-763-2121</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Security First Bank Vice President -- David D. Russell</p>
<p>P.O. Box 550 Phone=308-327-2412</p>
<p>Rushville, NE 69360 <b>Fax= 308-327-2215</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p>First National Bank of Gordon President -- Will Isham</p>
<p>P. O. Box 290 Phone=308-282-0050</p>
<p>Gordon, NE 69343 <b>Fax: 308-282-1103</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p><b>ISSUE:</b> Your Bank has received money <b><u>taken unlawfully</u></b> from the Flying W Ranch Inc. by Dennis D. King, which belongs to Edmond R. and Kathleen M. Jesse. Each of you was previously notified of this <b><u>SECURITIES FRAUD</u></b> in the first part of January 2013<b>,</b> in which you have willfully become involved. You were presented with Affidavit Demands to show cause for your actions or return the money. You ignored the Affidavit Demands and refused to answer or return the money to Edmond R. and Kathleen M. Jesse, the rightful owners. Most of this money came from the rustling of over 1000 head of livestock from the Flying W Ranch Inc. This rustling occurred while 74-year-old Edmond R. Jesse and 72-year-old Kathleen M. Jesse were, on August 13, 2012, fraudulently arrested and incarcerated in Box Butte County Jail under Sheriff Tammy Mowry, procured by Sheriff Terry Robbins of Sheridan County Nebraska.</p>
<p>Judge Travis P. O’Gorman, who then recused himself from the case, based this arrest and Fraudulent Jail incarceration upon a civil contempt charge, which only provides for a fine. <b><u>This action was Premeditated “Economic Assault and Battery</u>.”</b> This is <b>“Patent Evidence”</b> that you are <b><u>willfully</u></b> <b>“Harboring Stolen Property.”</b></p>
<p><b> </b></p>
<p><b><u> </u></b></p>
<h2><u>HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF THIS COMPLAINT</u></h2>
<p>Many years ago, this country, as a Colonial Organization, had to bring under Lawful control the King of England, <b>a Megalomaniac,</b> whom was in effect plundering the Colonies of the United States and injuring the colonists who rose up against that plundering. The colonists created an Instrument to describe to the English people their disgust for the King of England. That instrument in the language of today’s law is called a <b><u>Solemn Recognition of Mixed War</u>.</b> Solemn Recognition of Mixed War is not a declaration of War; it is a claim from the pleading <b>common citizens</b> that they are recognizing that they are being subjected to a War waged against them as Citizens unlawfully by a person having government authority, in this case the King of England. In simple terms, the Solemn Recognition of Mixed War was a Criminal Complaint against the King of England claiming that his acts <b><u>evinced a design</u></b> to reduce the colonies under <b><u>DESPOSTISM</u>.</b> It was closed with a pleading to the English people to treat the colonists righteously, fairly and justly under the law. The name of this famous Document was the <b>“<u>Declaration of Independence</u>.”</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p>The actions against Edmond and Kathleen Jesse parallel this situation on a smaller scale. In the case of the Colonies, the Colonists had to deal with the King of England, the English Parliament and the Bank of England. In the present case of the Elderly Jesses, they are having to deal with the officers of a Corrupt and Un-Just Government Legal system and the officers of the Local Banks who are serving the Purposes and Objectives of those Corrupt Government officers.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>One of the conditions, that was later put into the Constitution for the United States of America known as the third Amendment, was the condition that no soldiers would be quartered in a citizen’s house. The court has, in effect, quartered the Banks in the Jesse’s House as <b><u>Foreclosure Paid Mercenaries</u></b> controlling the Elderly Jesse’s substance, which the Elderly Jesses need to fight for their rights of Due Process under the Law, fight their court battles and protect their property. <b>By unlawfully withholding and harboring Edmond and Kathleen Jesse’s money away from their use, the Bank and each officer of the bank involved is <u>aiding & abetting</u> a Corrupt Justice system to the effect of Edmond and Kathleen Jesse’s <u>being subjected to “Economic Assault and Battery” by the Bank Officers</u>.</b> The phrase <b><u>unlawfully withholding and harboring</u></b> means that you are not responding to Affidavit documents being placed in your hands to be answered timely. You are <u>fantasizing</u> that you are above and beyond the responsibility of responding to the Elderly Jesse’s Affidavits and that your Wealth, Power and Self-Asserted Omnipotence predominate the Rights of the Citizens of America. Your attitude is a psychopathological condition known as <b><u>Megalomania</u>,</b> but you are not alone in your <b><u>Megalomania</u></b> because the Supreme Court of the United States has made a ruling that although the first Amendment of the Constitution for the United States provides that the Citizen has the right to petition the government for redress of grievances, the Government does not have a responsibility to respond to the Citizen’s Petition for redress of grievances. So between the Banks and the Supreme Court we have King George all over again.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>You are subjecting Edmond R. and Kathleen M. Jesse to <b>“<u>Economic Assault & Battery</u>.”</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p><b>MIXED WAR:</b> The acts of the Courts, the Sheriffs and other officers of the County and the State governments, including the Banks acting as an extension of the Government Power against the Jesses, <b>has <u>escalated</u></b> the Government’s and Bank’s behavior to a <b><u>Declaration of</u></b> <b><u>Mixed War</u></b> against the Elderly Jesses and the Citizens of America.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>It is clear that what is being done to the Elderly Jesses, <b>the Government officers and the Bank officers <u>acting in Conspiracy</u> are also willing to do to any member of the Public.</b> This means that the Government officers and the Bank officers, acting <b>as Megalomaniacs,</b> are willing to <b><u>Conspire to Confiscate the Private property of the American Public</u>.</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p> <b>See annexed:</b></p>
<p>SOLEMN RECOGNITION OF MIXED WAR</p>
<p> </p>
<p>TENTATIVE EXIGENT CRIMINAL COMPLAINT</p>
<p> </p>
<p>THE NATURE OF THIS EXIGENCY</p>
<p> </p>
<p>TIMELINE OF IRREVERSIBLE AND DANGEROUS EVENTS –3 pages</p>
<p> </p>
<p><b>See annexed:</b> <b>Affidavit & Demand upon cited Banks & Executives –Jan 4, 2013 –</b>2 pages and Exhibits of 17 pages</p>
<p><b>See annexed:</b> Affidavit of Material Facts –September 4, 2012 –5 pages</p>
<p><b>See annexed:</b> Notice to Nebraska State Court Administrator, Janice K. Walker –1 page</p>
<p align="left"> </p>
<p align="left">Respond to:</p>
<p align="left">Edmond R. Jesse and Kathleen M. Jesse </p>
<p align="left">1838 405 Trail</p>
<p align="left">Ellsworth, NE 69340-7132</p>
<p> </p>
<p><b>Randall David Due aka Randy Due</b>; Ex. Military (Civil Rights Advocate) Non-union Lawyer pursuant to 42 USC § 1986</p>
<p><b>Public Minister</b> pursuant to and protected by Public Law 94-583, Oct. 21, 1976 Stat. 2891 [Codified in Title 28 U.S.C § 1602 et esq.]; and Public Law 1790, 1 Stat. At L. 117, Ch 9 [Codified in 22 U.S.C. § 252]; Public Law 1948, Ch 645, 62 Stat. 688 [Codified in Title 18 U.S.C § 112] and Public Law 1871, Ch 22, § 6, 17 Stat. 15; [Codified in 42 U.S.C. § 1986]</p>
<p> </p>
<p>179 Green St. E., Pelham, Georgia 31779</p>
<p>Phone: (229) 294-6112 <a href="mailto:duze24@bellsouth.net">duze24@bellsouth.net</a></p>
<p>Fax: (229) 294-4594</p>
<p> </p>
<p>CC: Nebraska Supreme Court, Governor Dave Heineman, Attorney General Jon Bruning, DOJ Civil Rights Criminal Justice Division, Comptroller of the Currency, the Public, the Military, and selected Media</p> NOTICE TO THE MILITARYtag:wesurroundthemcentrecounty.ning.com,2013-01-22:3029713:Topic:486732013-01-22T18:05:24.763ZRandy Duehttps://wesurroundthemcentrecounty.ning.com/profile/RandyDue
<p>COVER LETTER TO THE MILITARY AND OTHER CONCERNED PUBLIC OFFICIALS</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I, Randall David Due, am presenting this document to you as an Honorably Discharged former Military Serviceman with the expectancy that you will read it and take it seriously. This document is presented to you under the implied Military Jurisdiction of 18 USC § 4, which exists pursuant to the following <u>recognized Traditional Principles</u> governing the United States of America.</p>
<h3>January 22,…</h3>
<p>COVER LETTER TO THE MILITARY AND OTHER CONCERNED PUBLIC OFFICIALS</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I, Randall David Due, am presenting this document to you as an Honorably Discharged former Military Serviceman with the expectancy that you will read it and take it seriously. This document is presented to you under the implied Military Jurisdiction of 18 USC § 4, which exists pursuant to the following <u>recognized Traditional Principles</u> governing the United States of America.</p>
<h3>January 22, 2013</h3>
<p><b>Traditional Principle #1: From the Declaration of Independence</b></p>
<p>We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain un-a-lien-able Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the <u>consent of the governed,.. 10<sup>th</sup> Amendment</u></p>
<p> </p>
<p><b>Traditional Principle #2: From the Constitution for the United States of America, Article VI, paragraph 2;</b> "This constitution shall be the <b>Supreme Law of the Land</b>; and the <b>judges in every state shall be bound thereby</b>, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding."</p>
<p> </p>
<p><b>Traditional Principle #3:</b> From Chief Justice Marshall, Marbury v. Madison, 5, U.S. (Cranch) 137, 174,176 <b>"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution, are null and void</b>."</p>
<p> </p>
<p><b>Traditional Principle #4: <u>Traditional Covenant Oath</u></b> <u><b>of Military service</b> <b>to the United States of America</b></u></p>
<p> </p>
<p>5 USC § 3331: “I, _________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will <b>support and <u>defend</u> the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and <u>domestic</u>;</b> that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I, Randall David Due, enlisted in the Air National Guard at Terre Haute, Indiana in 1969 and I took this military oath and served my country Honorably for 6 years and was Honorably discharged from this regular Military service. I continue to serve my country pursuant to and in satisfaction of this Covenant Oath, which never expires. I have continued to be active in a quasi military capacity as a Public Minister serving my fellow countryman as a teacher and promoter of the fine <b><u>Traditional Principles</u></b> of Freedoms, Liberties, and Pursuit of Happiness, as set forth above.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>See the attached Exhibits list of my flyers and some of my current work as a Public Minister.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>These Exhibits bear witness to my ongoing attempt to fulfill my Covenant Military Oath. My <b><u>contribution</u></b> and efforts are directed toward stabilizing the internal workings of America to <b><u>prevent violence</u></b> from destroying America from within. Some Federal Judges and other court officers are perpetrating and perpetuating <b><u>crime in and corruption of our Judicial system</u></b> in direct conflict and in contempt of the Oath and Services of our Country Military Servicemen and their Commanders.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The American Taxpayer has paid <b>“<u>Dearly</u>”</b> for Service, not Dis-service. They are entitled to <b>“<u>Just Compensation</u>”</b> for their Economic Sacrifices. My family, friends, and fellow countrymen have paid Taxes to support Legitimate Government and their sons and daughters have <b>“<u>sacrificed</u>”</b> <b>their lives</b> on Military battlefields <b><u>presumably to guarantee</u></b> a <b>“<u>Valid Justice System</u>.”</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p><b>18 USC § 4</b> “Mandates” that I report the felony offenses I am aware of to somebody in Military authority. I am hereby fulfilling that Duty by this Document to you as Military officers.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><b>18 USC § 4</b> <b>Misprision of Felony:</b> Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or <b><u>military authority under the United States</u></b>, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><b>Federal Judges, U.S. Prosecuting Attorneys and other unknown parties in case # 8:12CR344 are engaged in <u>impersonating a Military Officer</u> in the direct suspension of <u>Civil Rights</u> by an <u>Act</u> of <u>Martial Law</u>.</b></p>
<p><b> </b></p>
<p align="center">See annexed: <b>AFFIDAVIT OF SOLEMN RECOGNITION OF MIXED WAR</b></p>
<p align="center"><b>(MIXED WAR IN THE NATURE OF MARTIAL LAW) and supporting Documents.</b></p>
<p><b> </b></p>
<h2><u>A DEMAND FOR IMMEDIATE CORRECTIVE ACTION</u></h2>
<p> </p>
<p>I, Randall David Due, Public Minister, demand that you as Military personnel honor and consumate your Oath to Support and Defend the Constitution of the United States from all enemies, foreign and “<u>Domestic</u>,” by coming to the Public’s aide in this situation. I demand the Military to arrest and remove these offending Federal Judges and U.S. prosecuting attorneys from office for unlawfully exercising the Jurisdiction of Martial Law in the Civilian Justice system and, <b>in effect <u>impersonating</u> Military officers.</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p>See annexed document case 8:12CR344, <b><u>Affidavit of Solemn Recognition of Mixed War</u></b>, against a Federal Judge for violating the Civil Rights of Donna Marie Kozak and other Citizen’s, by depriving them of <b>“<u>Valid assistance of Counsel</u>,”</b> in a Civilian Justice system and thereby subjecting them to Martial Law.</p>
<p align="center"><b> </b></p>
<p><b><u>If you as a Military officer and/or any Public official disagree with this claim, I, Randall David Due, Public Minister, Civil Rights Advocate, demand that you immediately show to me Specific “Just Cause” to the contrary by Affidavit sworn to be True, Correct, Complete, and not misleading under your own Commercial Liability</u></b><b>.</b></p>
<p><b> </b></p>
<p><b>Failure to support and defend the Constitution protecting our Freedoms, Liberties, and Pursuit of Happiness from the said “Domestic Enemies,” <u>shall cripple the Military</u> because there will not remain the Stable Economic structure in America required to support and finance the Military as it exists.</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p>You may visit <a href="http://ksdzfm.com/">http://KSDZFM.com/</a> and listen to my past regular weekly broadcasts archived to better understand my position.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>You may visit <a href="http://civilrightsfreedom.com/">http://CivilRightsFreedom.com/</a> for further info.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>You may contact me personally should you wish further answers.</p>
<p><b> </b></p>
<p><b>Randall David Due aka Randy Due</b>; Ex. Military (Civil Rights Advocate) Non-union Lawyer pursuant to 42 USC § 1986</p>
<p><b>Public Minister</b> pursuant to and protected by Public Law 94-583, Oct. 21, 1976 Stat. 2891 [Codified in Title 28 U.S.C § 1602 et esq.]; and Public Law 1790, 1 Stat. At L. 117, Ch 9 [Codified in 22 U.S.C. § 252]; Public Law 1948, Ch 645, 62 Stat. 688 [Codified in Title 18 U.S.C § 112] and Public Law 1871, Ch 22, § 6, 17 Stat. 15; [Codified in 42 U.S.C. § 1986]</p>
<p> </p>
<p>179 Green St. E., Pelham, Georgia 31779</p>
<p>Phone: (229) 294-6112 <a href="mailto:duze24@bellsouth.net">duze24@bellsouth.net</a></p>
<p>Fax: (229) 294-4594</p> Enforcementtag:wesurroundthemcentrecounty.ning.com,2012-10-14:3029713:Topic:481732012-10-14T21:36:37.198ZRandy Duehttps://wesurroundthemcentrecounty.ning.com/profile/RandyDue
<p>If we don't have Enforcement, then why are they attempting to expunge our Liens from Public Records?</p>
<p>This is going to be notarized and sent to the Court.</p>
<p><br></br>IN THE COUNTY COURT OF BOYD COUNTY, NEBRASKA</p>
<p>AFFIDAVIT of COMMERCIAL FACTS</p>
<p>State of Georgia )<br></br> ) ss.<br></br>County of Mitchell )</p>
<p>Notice to Clerk of Court: Return a copy of this document showing it has been Time stamped, dated, with filing number recorded into the Court Records. (18 USC § 3) (See FAX…</p>
<p>If we don't have Enforcement, then why are they attempting to expunge our Liens from Public Records?</p>
<p>This is going to be notarized and sent to the Court.</p>
<p><br/>IN THE COUNTY COURT OF BOYD COUNTY, NEBRASKA</p>
<p>AFFIDAVIT of COMMERCIAL FACTS</p>
<p>State of Georgia )<br/> ) ss.<br/>County of Mitchell )</p>
<p>Notice to Clerk of Court: Return a copy of this document showing it has been Time stamped, dated, with filing number recorded into the Court Records. (18 USC § 3) (See FAX Cover Page.)</p>
<p><br/>COUNTY OF BOYD ex rel, Flesh and Blood Party has not been Identified(Plaintiff)Bonding Company and Performance and/orFidelity Bond #s and/or Public Official Liability Insurance of et al Accessory Accomplices have not been declaredvs.Public Minister:Randall David Due, et al, (Respondent)Appearing in Proper Flesh and Blood capacity, having assistance of counsel of my choice, reserving the power to object to interference and to complain pursuant to 18 USC § 4, 3, & 1st Amendment Petition for Redress of Grievances ))))))))))))))))))) Case No. CI 12-49Affidavit of Commercial FactsContesting FRAUD Plaintiff attempting to remove valid Commercial Filings from the Public RecordsPoints of LawPrinciple: compensation for services, demands, liens upon disservice, hence corrective Liens are Consensual.U.S.A Constitution Article IV § I, Amend.1, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, & 1442 USC § 198618 USC §§ 3, 4, 241, 242, 1001, 1341, 1621, 1622, 2071, 2381, & 2383</p>
<p><br/>Affidavit of Material Fact(s)</p>
<p>Affiant, Randall David Due, certifies under my own commercial liability that the following is true, correct, materially complete, and not misleading to the best of my knowledge and belief.</p>
<p>PREFACE</p>
<p>>1) Ashley Boettcher has failed to properly identify herself and others as the moving Flesh and Blood Parties in this case. This is a FRAUD.</p>
<p>>2) Ashley Boettcher has attempted to change the Jurisdiction and Title of our Lawfully recorded Public Commercial Instruments. Her action is a Fraud.</p>
<p>>3) Ashley Boettcher is attempting to procure the support of the Court and the Judge to expunge Lawful Commercial Public Records at the Public Recording office.</p>
<p>>4) Ashley Boettcher has also committed Mail Fraud by claiming to have served each of us by United States Mail. There is no such thing as service by mail when mail is sent out in the ordinary way. Only the envelope receives the Certified labels. The envelope is certified, the contents are not certified. Service by mail is only possible by making the envelope an integral part of the legal document. The letter I received from Ashley was not sent by certified mail. Therefore, the postman cannot be called to a witness stand as a Process Server. I do acknowledge receipt of a letter from her, but I do not know if she enclosed everything and I do not know if I have received everything. Her 1st page had a page footer, page #1, and her second page had a page footer, page #2. Her letter does not contain page footers stating page 1 of 2 pages and page 2 of 2 pages so that I would know that I have the complete instrument. Furthermore, if it was a standard International Commercial Instrument, it would be exactly two pages long and the two pages would be back-to-back on the same sheet, so that the two pages could not become separated. This might seem trifling at little things, but Ashley Boettcher states that Quote: “attached hereto as Exhibit “A”…Exhibit “B”… .” There were no such attachments to her letter and nothing floating around separately in the envelope. In short, her process was sent by mail, not served by mail, and it was incomplete and she owes me a copy of the thing she says was attached. I do appreciate receiving her letter. I send out many Affidavits that run for more than two pages. I try to make my writings complete. I try to answer every question that is raised. And if I have faulted somebody on something they are supposed to have, I try to correct this situation. If I do not make the envelope an integral part of the Affidavit document, I do not claim to have served it. If something is missing that I have said should be with my letter, then I want to be notified immediately so that I can provide it.</p>
<p>>5) Your attempts to expunge Lawful Public Recordings have made you an Accessory Accomplice as described in 18 USC § 3 to the crimes already committed by the parties identified in the documents Lawfully recorded in Boyd County.</p>
<p>>6) Who gave you instructions to write your letter?</p>
<p>>7) Who paid you to write your letter?</p>
<p>>8) Who Bonded you to write your letter?</p>
<p>>9) Who is going to accept your Commercial Liability for performing this act? I am not trying to be difficult with you, but these are all steps and items in the law, which come into question as a result of actions such as you’ve committed.</p>
<p>>10) My objective is to protect the Public, not to make life difficult for any person who is trying to do what is right.</p>
<p>Ashley Boettcher’s letter</p>
<p>On Friday, October 12, 2012, I, Randall David Due, received a letter from Ashley Boettcher, in which Ashley purports to be a Boyd County Attorney, having her office at, and Doing Business As (D.B.A.) Boyd County Attorney. At: Boyd County, PO Box 27, Butte, NE 68722</p>
<p>The letter was postmarked on Tuesday, October 9, 2012, with a Court date of Monday, the 15th!</p>
<p>No known flesh and blood person has been cited as claimant, making the claim upon their own Commercial Liability.</p>
<p>Boyd County cannot be a Plaintiff because it/they cannot be placed on the witness stand and be cross-examined.</p>
<p>I have no claims filed against Boyd County as a Debtor or Defendant at this time, so there is nothing to strike from the records.</p>
<p>Ashley Boettcher’s writing implies that she is presenting a motion on behalf of Boyd County, but her name does not appear as ex rel on behalf of Boyd County; that is to say, a case is not set as Boyd County, ex rel Ashley Boettcher, Plaintiff. </p>
<p>Most people would consider it obvious that the County is acting through its own Prosecuting Attorney, making it unnecessary to go through these formalities; however, there is a peculiarity in this situation. I have no action against Boyd County in these present cases and if Ashley Boettcher is a Prosecuting attorney for Boyd County, she would know that. So she must be speaking for herself, ex rel D.B.A. Prosecuting Attorney.</p>
<p>Not only is Ashley Boettcher behaving as an imposter, but also what she is trying to do is not clear.</p>
<p>Consider what Ashley Boettcher has as the title of her brief: Motion to Strike Notice by Common Law. </p>
<p>The subject heading of this filing is indefinite.</p>
<p>Ashley Boettcher does not state the subject matter of the Notice, so one has no way of knowing what type of Notice it is. </p>
<p>Case No. CI 12-49. This is the case number provided on the document.</p>
<p>The subject matter of the document is given as follows: Quote: “Motion to Strike Notice by Common Law” </p>
<p>This raises four issues, each by their own word, which is Motion, Strike, Notice, and Common Law.</p>
<p>The word Motion implies that this matter is not Commercial, because Commercial processes consist of Affidavits, Demands, and Notices. Motions are part of parliamentary procedure, which is characteristic of Domestic Judicial Non-Commercial Processes. Motions have no place in Contract Law. Contract Law is definite, not suggestive. I do not deal in any form of Law, which requires Motions.</p>
<p>The next word used is Strike. Nobody in Commerce, who is not a party to a contract, has the option to “Strike” something from a Contract. A Judge cannot set the price on a grocer’s apples.</p>
<p>The next word is Notice. This desire to “Strike” a Notice is Peculiar, because Notices have no Power in Commercial Law, without identification of the item with which the Notice is concerned.</p>
<p>The object of the Notice is not defined.</p>
<p>The next word is Common Law. The phrase: By Common Law refers only to a process, not to an object. Common Law is not Commercial Law and Commercial law is not Common Law. I only deal in Commercial Law. The process of Commercial Law and the processes of Common Law are not the same. I only operate with Commercial Law and my area of Commercial Law is Criminal Law connected with Civil Rights. Criminal Law is a Commercial process of a Government and Civil Rights are the Public status of the Citizen relative to the Government according to the Commercial rules of the Constitution for the United States of America and its Bill of Rights. The Commercial violations of these Rights are valued pursuant to Title 18 USC § 4 and other Title 18 United States Codes dealing with Civil Rights. For example: 18 USC §§ 241 & 242.</p>
<p>Therefore, the remainder of Ashley’s letter will be analyzed relative to the foregoing definition of the Subject Heading of the document.</p>
<p>Ashley Boettcher’s Quote: “Plaintiff County of Boyd, Nebraska (hereinafter “Boyd County”), for its Motion to Strike…</p>
<p>Response: A fiction cannot move. Ashley Boettcher is the moving party on behalf of the County. Ashley Boettcher is committing the acts in this process. Therefore, the Law must justify Ashley Boettcher, not the County. And Ashley Boettcher must represent the matter truthfully pursuant to the Law.</p>
<p>Ashley Boettcher’s Quote: …Motion to Strike pursuant to Neb.Rev.Stat.§52-1904 (captioned “Lien; strike from the record; when.”)… </p>
<p>Response: Any person who read this portion of Ashley Boettcher’s writing wouldn’t have the slightest idea of what is going on. Ashley has cited a Statute that even if it was legislated, has been destroyed by codification. Ashley has not quoted the law and she has not partitioned the part of the quotation that she wants the reader to understand. Her objective is disguised by the manner in which she has brought these words before the judge, so that only she and the judge know what is going on and the common citizen is left completely ignorant of the process. The word “Lien” is brought forward out of thin air like a frame of a cartoon into which something magically appears. Liens are the most fundamental process of Law. Everybody in the world relies upon Liens by one name or another to enforce the collection of debts and Common Law has nothing to do with it, because Liens rely entirely on the Laws of Nature. If a person does not respect the power of a Lien, his next choice is to be a Thief. That is what is meant by Article 1 Section 10 Clause 1 of the Constitution for the United States of America. No State shall pass any law impairing the Obligation of Contracts. An Obligation of Contract formally presented in commerce is called a Lien and consists of an Affidavit statement of Obligation. </p>
<p>All loans are collectible by Liens. All Fundamental Commerce is Jewish in Nature, because it is derived from the old Hebrew Merchant Law. For this reason any attempt on the part of any State to interfere with Liens would cause any and every Jewish Lender to be extremely wary of any State that would interfere with the Obligation of Contracts and Liens. No State dares to create or have a Statute which interferes with the Commercial Lien process because it would make them the Lawful prey of every Moneylender in the United States and be grounds for foreclosure of any and every Commercial Loan made to any State or County Government. For this reason Ashley Boettcher’s references to Common Law are immaterial. All of my work is done in Commercial Law and all of the recording offices of the State of Nebraska will respect my right and the right of every other citizen to file any and every Commercial Lien that they have justified under 18 USC § 4 and all of the U. S. Statues regarding Civil Rights.</p>
<p>Ashley Boettcher’s Quote: … (hereinafter Neb.Rev.Stat.§52-1904), hereby moves this Court for an Order striking from the record the “Notice by Common Law” filed on or about September 14, 2012 by Randall David Due.</p>
<p>Response: I don’t file Common Law Notices, I file Public Commercial Liens and they are served on the parties as proper Notice. I file or teach other people to file Public Commercial Liens in support of their Civil Rights and the Civil Rights of the Public at large. Every Tyrant including Adolph Hitler has tried what you are trying to do. I am not going to argue with you on these points because it is not necessary. You people cannot resist the temptation to change the jurisdiction and titles of instruments. The State of Nebraska is not going to violate Jewish Commercial Law without paying a very dear price for it. I don’t have to convince you of this. If you do not agree with my Commercial Processes just pick up your phone and call a Rabbi.</p>
<p>Affiant(s) exercise the right to amend this and/or any other document if necessary, in order that the truth be more fully and certainly ascertained and justly determined.<br/> I, Randall David Due, in the Flesh and Blood in Proper Person, do not consent to be an accessory party to Fraud (18 USC §§ 3 & 4) and/or violation of my certain un-a-lien-able Rights endowed by my Creator and secured by the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and by our soldiers who swear an Oath to defend this Nation and its Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. Further more, I reserve all of my Rights using the UCC 1-308 (Performance or Acceptance under Reservation of Rights) in relationship to any past and or future action concerning this case. Notice is hereby given. Fraud vitiates all Contracts and is grounds for reversal of all Legal Faults.<br/>NOTICE: THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO THREATEN, HARASS, HINDER, OR OBSTRUCT ANY LAWFUL OPERATIONS. IT IS FOR THE PURPOSES OF OBTAINING LAWFUL REMEDY. [Constitution & UCC § 1-201; 18 USC § 4]</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Affiant, Randall David Due, certifies under my own commercial liability that the following is true, correct, materially complete, and not misleading to the best of my knowledge and belief.</p>
<p><br/>Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal; Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent</p>
<p><br/>Executed this _______ day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand twelve.</p>
<p> <br/> By: _____________________________________<br/> (Signature of Affiant)</p>
<p><br/>Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this ________day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand twelve by Randall David Due. <br/> </p>
<p>____ Personally Known<br/>____ Produced Identification<br/>Type and # of ID_________________________<br/> <br/> ______________________________________<br/> (Signature of Notary)<br/>(Seal)<br/> ______________________________________<br/> (Name of Notary Typed, Stamped, or Printed)<br/> <br/> Notary Public, State of Georgia<br/> </p>
<p>LEGAL NOTICE<br/>The Certifying Notary is an independent contractor and not a party to this claim. In fact the Certifying Notary is a Federal Witness Pursuant to TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 73, SEC. 1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant. The Certifying Notary also performs the functions of a quasi-Postal Inspector under the Homeland Security Act by being compelled to report any violations of the U.S. Postal regulations as an Officer of the Executive Department. Intimidating a Notary Public under Color of Law is a violation of Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 242, titled “Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law,” which primarily governs police misconduct investigations. This Statute makes it a crime for any person acting under the Color of Law to willfully deprive any individual residing in the United States and/or United States of America those rights protected by the Constitution and U.S. laws.</p> PUBLIC MINISTERtag:wesurroundthemcentrecounty.ning.com,2012-10-06:3029713:Topic:481692012-10-06T00:01:12.709ZRandy Duehttps://wesurroundthemcentrecounty.ning.com/profile/RandyDue
<p>Public Minister</p>
<p align="center"> </p>
<p>The term <b>“<u>Public Minister</u>”</b> does mean:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Public Ministers take rank, upon the date of the official notification of the existence of their intent to serve as a Public Minister, pursuant to the civilized laws governing, and provided for, such service.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>>A) A Public Minister is a representative of one Judicial Jurisdiction, to a Judicial Jurisdiction of a foreign authority or…</p>
<p>Public Minister</p>
<p align="center"> </p>
<p>The term <b>“<u>Public Minister</u>”</b> does mean:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Public Ministers take rank, upon the date of the official notification of the existence of their intent to serve as a Public Minister, pursuant to the civilized laws governing, and provided for, such service.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>>A) A Public Minister is a representative of one Judicial Jurisdiction, to a Judicial Jurisdiction of a foreign authority or power.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>>B) <b><u>Ministerial Power and Duty</u> -</b> the powers and the corresponding required duties associated with those powers:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>DEFINITION – A “Donee” is a member of the public who is invested with <u>a power</u> of appointment; the party executing <u>a power</u>; ideally, <u>the true power</u> of appointment to this office exists by the already proven devotion of the person, acting in the capacity of a Public Minister, to render legitimate service for his countrymen, generally the Public. Ministerial Power is the civilian or domestic counterpart of the Military Power. The finest well-known historical example of a Public Minister is Jesus Christ. “No greater love hath a man than that he would lay down his life for his friends.”</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Ministerial Powers are powers given for the general good, not exclusively, necessarily, or at all for the good of the Donee himself, but for the good of several parties, also including or not including the Donee. That is, these powers are for the good of the public, generally, and then indirectly for the Donee as a member of the public.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The powers and corresponding duties are called powers and duties because the Donee-Executor, of those powers and the corresponding duties, is serving as a Minister or Public Servant in his exercise of those powers and duties.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The power and duty of the Public Minister rests upon the Law of Nations as well as upon Treaties. The primary duty of the Public Minister is the protection of the interests of his countrymen. The establishment of Ministerial Power is by character, not by governments.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>>C) <b><u>The Public Minister’s protection of the interest of the parties of the judicial jurisdiction represented</u>;</b> concerning that which the Public Minister protects.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Public Ministers are bound to see that the unknown or foreign authority laws of the jurisdiction wherein they officiate are properly administrated, so as to protect the interests of their nationals. Their official character as a Public Minister / Public Servant must be taken as sufficient evidence of authority to perform all of those acts that customarily, or by statute or code, are entrusted to Public Ministers for performance, for example: 42 USC § 1986 and 18 USC § 4.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The authority of a Public Minister to protect the estates and the rights of his countrymen within his judicial jurisdiction, from loss or waste, is recognized by all civilized nations as inherent in the Office of Public Minister under the accepted Principles of International Law, and the tribunals have consistently given recognition to the power of a Public Minister, of a judicial jurisdiction foreign to the jurisdiction of the tribunal, to assert or defend the property rights as well as the personal rights of his nationals, irrespective of whether or not he has been accorded the right to represent them in tribunal by provision or otherwise.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Even in the absence of specific authorization to act as the personal agent of his nationals, and in the absence of a treaty, a Public Minister, duly recognized, has, under the Principles of International Law, the authority and the privilege to represent his fellow countrymen in the tribunals of the state.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A Public Minister is authorized to assert claims in behalf of his nationals, even where the claimants are unknown. However, he must have specific authority, by criminal statute or otherwise, before he can obtain actual restitution or proceeds.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Public Minister, and all people generally, must always be aware of the fundamental foundational principle of human civilization:</p>
<p>“If righteousness is not made profitable, then corruption will prevail.”</p>
<p> </p>
<p>>D) <b><u>Immunity of Public Minister</u> –</b> concerning that which protects a Public Minister;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The rule that tribunals have no jurisdiction over a foreign sovereign extends also to its Public Ministers.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In <u>Public Law 1790, Statutes at Large 117, Chapter 9, codified in 22 USC Section 252</u>, it is provided that whenever any <u>Writ</u> or <u>Process</u> is sued out or prosecuted by a person in any tribunal of the United States or of a state, or by a Judge or Justice, whereby the person or any Public Minister of a foreign jurisdiction, or any foreign or domestic servant of any such Minister is arrested or imprisoned or his goods or chattels are distrained, seized, or attached, such <u>Writ of Process</u> shall be deemed void.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>It is also provided that whenever a <u>Writ of Process</u> is sued out in violation of this prohibition, every person by whom the same is obtained or presented, whether as a party, or as attorney, or as solicitor, and every officer served in executing it, shall be deemed a violator of the Laws of Nations and a disturber of the public repose, he shall be subject to the penalty provided by Law.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>See <u>Public Law 1948, Chapter 645, 62 Stat 688, codified in 18 USC § 112</u>, and <u>Public Law 1871, Chapter 22 Sect 6, 17 Stat 15, codified in 42 USC § 1986.</u></p> CONSEQUENCES OF JUDGES’ DISHONOR OF TITLE 18 USC § 4tag:wesurroundthemcentrecounty.ning.com,2012-09-30:3029713:Topic:481672012-09-30T18:37:34.755ZRandy Duehttps://wesurroundthemcentrecounty.ning.com/profile/RandyDue
<h1>CONSEQUENCES OF JUDGES’ DISHONOR OF TITLE 18 USC § 4</h1>
<p> </p>
<p><b>18 USC § 3</b>: <b>Accessory after the fact</b> Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, <b>receives, relieves, comforts, or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension</b>, trial, or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Any Judge, Public Official, and/or Military Officer(s) who chooses to <b><u>DISHONOR,</u></b> <b><u>RIDICULE, AND/OR…</u></b></p>
<h1>CONSEQUENCES OF JUDGES’ DISHONOR OF TITLE 18 USC § 4</h1>
<p> </p>
<p><b>18 USC § 3</b>: <b>Accessory after the fact</b> Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, <b>receives, relieves, comforts, or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension</b>, trial, or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Any Judge, Public Official, and/or Military Officer(s) who chooses to <b><u>DISHONOR,</u></b> <b><u>RIDICULE, AND/OR TREAT WITH CONTEMPT THE PROCESS</u></b> of TITLE 18 USC § 4 Law, has made him/her self an <b><u>Accessory Accomplice</u></b> to the Crimes having been committed.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Any Judge, Public Official, and/or Military Officer(s) who attempts to stop and/or impedes Citizens from filing Criminal Complaints against <b><u>ORGANIZED CRIME</u></b> <b>in the Government</b>, especially against crimes committed by themselves or their co-workers or agents, are committing Paper Terrorism (Domestic Terrorism, 18 USC § 2331 (5)), against Citizens. The Paper Terrorism being referred to in this process is initiated by Judges converting Criminal Complaints into Civil Complaints in order to evade the charges and open the door for Official Retaliation against the reporting Citizen(s). The alternative method initiated by Judges is to file the Criminal Complaints as Motions and to ORDER them as “stricken,” or to deny/discharge those Criminal Complaints as Frivolous, thereby, trying to evade the charges and render the lawful process, i.e. THE LAW, to report a crime, mandated by 18 USC § 4, null and void. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>District 8 Federal Judges <b><u>Laurie Smith Camp</u>,</b> <b><u>F.A. Gossett III</u>,</b> <b><u>John M. Gerrard</u>, <u>Joseph F. Bataillon</u>,</b> and <b><u>Richard G. Kopf</u></b> are involved in this <b><u>ORGANIZED CRIME</u></b> in reference to Criminal Complaints filed in Federal Court in Omaha, Nebraska stemming from Case No. CI 11-58 & CI 12-35 and Case # 8:12CR 56-LSC-FG3.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>18 USC § 4 Mandates a Citizen to report Criminal Behavior or face Criminal Charges, fines and/or imprisonment. If the Citizen knows he/she is required by law to complain under18 USC § 4, and failure to report the crime can result in fine or imprisonment or both, and also knows the Judge is of such a character that he/she will retaliate against him/her the accuser, then the Citizen finds him/her self in the Terrifying situation of being Dammed if he/she doesn’t file (18 USC § 4) and Dammed if he/she does file (a victim of the Evil Character of the Judge). Any Judge who issues a public statement warning Citizens that they cannot file Criminal Charges is thereby inducing the Citizen to violate 18 USC § 4, and he, who has the Evil Character to retaliate against the Citizen, is a <b>Judge who is engaging in</b> <b>Paper Terrorism</b> (amongst <u>other</u> violations)<b>.</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p>According to the foregoing, any Judge, Public Official, and/or Military Officer(s) who claims Citizens cannot file Criminal Complaints Peaceably Petitioning the Government for Redress of Grievances is committing Paper Terrorism (Domestic Terrorism, 18 USC § 2331 (5)), Rebellion or Insurrection (18 USC § 2383), and Treason (18 USC § 2381) against US Code and the U. S. Constitution & 18 USC § 4, when they attempt to Chill (scare, instill fear in) Citizens regarding their 1<sup>st</sup> Amendment Right to Peaceably Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>If Public officials do not have to obey Title 18 USC § 4, then Citizens have the Right to Conscientiously object to Selective Service without an Official Threat of imprisonment. On the same terms, the Military would not have any authority to prosecute any Citizen refusing Military service and the selective service system would be Null and Void.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>If 18 USC § 4 is no good, then 10 USC (Uniform Code of Military Justice) is no good.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Military’s primary purpose is to fight Foreign Enemies, but the military’s oath to defend the Constitution and the American people also includes fighting against domestic enemies. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>If Citizens don’t report felony offenses committed by foreign or domestic enemies against the Constitution for the United States of America, and the laws made pursuant thereto, to some Judge or person in Civil or Military authority (18 USC § 4), then that failure to report constitutes harboring a Criminal, and aiding and abetting the Enemy. (18 USC § 2381 - Treason)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Some Federal Judges are attempting to procure Citizens to harbor and conceal the presence of the <u>Public Official Domestic Enemies</u> amongst us by denying Citizens the Rights and Responsibility to file Criminal Complaints as Mandated pursuant to 18 USC § 4, which being Mandatory, cannot, therefore, require a filing fee. (See, also, the Civil Rights Act of 1866.)</p>
<p> </p>
<p><b>The Civil Rights Act, 1866</b> Sec. 4 <i>And be it further enacted,</i> <b>That the district attorneys, marshals, and deputy marshals of the United States, the commissioners appointed by the circuit and territorial courts of the United States…</b> are hereby specially authorized and <b><u>required</u>,</b> <b>at the <u>expense</u> of the United States, to institute proceedings against all and every person who shall violate the provisions of this act, and cause him or them to be arrested and imprisoned, or bailed, as the case may be</b>, for trial before such court of the United States...</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Any Judge, Public Official, and/or Military Officer(s) attempting to convert a Criminal Complaint filed pursuant to 18 USC § 4 into a Civil case and <b>claiming the Citizen is required to pay a <u>filing fee</u></b> has and is committing <b><u>Extortion</u>.</b></p>
<p> </p>
<h1>18 USC § 872 - Extortion by officers or employees of the United States</h1>
<p>Whoever, being an officer, or employee of the United States or any department or agency thereof, or representing himself to be or assuming to act as such, <b>under color or pretense of office or employment commits or attempts an act of extortion, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than <u>three years</u>, or both…</b></p>
<p> </p>
<h1>18 USC § 1951 - Interference with commerce by threats or violence</h1>
<p>(2) The term <b>“<u>extortion</u>”</b> means the <b><u>obtaining of property (money or personal information – 4<sup>th</sup> Amendment, etc.) from another</u>,</b> with his consent, induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or <b><u>under color of official right</u>.</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p>If any Judge, Public Official, and/or Military Officer(s) believes any of this Commercial Process to be False, said Judge, Public Official, and/or Military Officer(s) is required by their own respective government systems to produce Affidavit(s) specifically showing “Just Cause” with Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law to support their Specific disagreement claims, and these Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law must be sworn to be true, correct, materially complete, and not misleading, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, and be available for Public Inspection by the Court of Public opinion of the People/Citizens of this Nation. Anything less shall be considered a Non-Response, Dishonor, and Default on the part of</p>
<p>the Judge, Public Official, and/or Military Officer(s), and an evasion of Due Process.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Respond to:</p>
<p>Randy Due --Ex military (Civil Rights Advocate) Non-union Lawyer pursuant to 42 USC 1986</p>
<p>179 Green St. E., Pelham, Georgia 31779</p>
<p>(229) 294-6112 - - - <a href="mailto:duze24@bellsouth.net">duze24@bellsouth.net</a></p> RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMStag:wesurroundthemcentrecounty.ning.com,2012-09-24:3029713:Topic:480612012-09-24T19:33:01.688ZRandy Duehttps://wesurroundthemcentrecounty.ning.com/profile/RandyDue
<p>WARNING TO DEFENDANTS (DEBTORS) NAMED IN CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS</p>
<p> </p>
<p>CRIMINAL LAWS SPECIFICALLY AWARDING DAMAGES FOR VIOLATION OF CITIZENS’ CIVIL RIGHTS</p>
<p> </p>
<p>18 USC § 241 Conspiracy Against Rights</p>
<p> </p>
<p>18 USC § 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law</p>
<p> </p>
<p><b><u>Misprision</u> Definition:</b> (1) Mal-administration of Public Office. (2) Neglect in preventing or reporting a crime. Source: American Heritage Dictionary of the English language –New…</p>
<p>WARNING TO DEFENDANTS (DEBTORS) NAMED IN CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS</p>
<p> </p>
<p>CRIMINAL LAWS SPECIFICALLY AWARDING DAMAGES FOR VIOLATION OF CITIZENS’ CIVIL RIGHTS</p>
<p> </p>
<p>18 USC § 241 Conspiracy Against Rights</p>
<p> </p>
<p>18 USC § 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law</p>
<p> </p>
<p><b><u>Misprision</u> Definition:</b> (1) Mal-administration of Public Office. (2) Neglect in preventing or reporting a crime. Source: American Heritage Dictionary of the English language –New College Edition copyright 1980 by Houghton Mifflin Company</p>
<p><b><u> </u></b></p>
<p><b><u>Misprision</u> Definition: </b> to do wrong; (1) Misconduct, esp. in office or in neglect of duty. (2) mistake. Contempt; scorn. Source: Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary – A Merriam-Webster copyright 1956 by G. & C. Merriam Co., Publishers</p>
<p><b><u> </u></b></p>
<p><b>18 USC § 4</b> <b><u>Misprision</u> of Felony:</b> Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same <b><u>to some judge</u></b> or <b><u>other person in civil</u></b> or <b><u>military authority</u></b> under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.</p>
<p> </p>
<div><p><b>The Civil Rights Act, 1866</b> Sec. 4 <i>And be it further enacted,</i> <b>That the district attorneys, marshals, and deputy marshals of the United States, the commissioners appointed by the circuit and territorial courts of the United States…</b> are hereby specially authorized and <b><u>required</u>,</b> <b>at the <u>expense</u> of the United States, to institute proceedings against all and every person who shall violate the provisions of this act, and cause him or them to be arrested and imprisoned, or bailed, as the case may be</b>, for trial before such court of the United States...</p>
<p> </p>
</div>
<p> </p>
<p align="center">WHEN FEDERAL JUDGES AND U.S. PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS <b><u>DISHONOR</u></b>, <b><u>RIDICULE, & TREAT WITH CONTEMPT</u></b> THEIR OWN TITLE 18 STATUES, WHICH REGULATE THEIR PROFESSION, THEY DISABLE AND DESTROY THE MEANING OF THE CRIMINAL SYSTEM AND ALL OF ITS FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND DIS-ENGAGE THEMSELVES FROM THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA <b>LEAVING THE NATION OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ENTIRELY DEPENDANT UPON THEIR OWN MEANS OF SELF-DEFENSE INCLUDING</b> <b>DUELING AND RESORTING TO FIREARMS WITHOUT RECOURSE.</b></p>
<p> </p>
<h1> </h1>
<h1>LET US TAKE A LOOK AT WHAT THIS MEANS</h1>
<p> </p>
<p>The Right to Keep and Bear Arms (Anything equivalent to what the Military Possesses) is the Citizens’ Right to protect oneself when the Government cannot and/or refuses to protect the Citizen. Title 18 USC § 4 is the counter-balance to the Citizens’ Right to Keep and Bear Arms. If the Citizen cannot complain to the Government in a Criminal matter, then he has to be able to defend himself, without limit. <b><u> </u></b></p>
<p>The Defendant (Debtor) is being denied assistance of “Due Process of Law” by the Federal Judges & U. S. Prosecuting Attorneys, who are refusing to provide the Defendant (Debtor) a Trial by Jury, so that he has an opportunity to clear his name of the Criminal charges so named against him in the Criminal Complaint.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This means that the Federal Government, by the <b><u>DISHONOR</u></b>, <b><u>RIDICULE,AND CONTEMPT FOR PROCESS</u></b> by its Agents, has given up all Authority to deal with the Criminal Charges of the case, now and later. The Citizen now may bring prosecution and seek Remedy pursuant to Commercial Law (Contract Law), which is the Peaceable Remedy left to the Citizen, guaranteed under the 1<sup>st</sup> Amendment of the United States Constitution of America, and a protection guaranteed under the 2<sup>nd</sup> Amendment, Right to Keep and Bear Arms.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>“Do not let anyone claim to be a True American, if they ever attempt to remove religion from politics…. Government is not reason. It is not eloquence. It is a Force, like Fire: A dangerous servant and a terrible master…. The very atmosphere of fire arms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference----- they deserve a place of Honor with all that is Good.”---- George Washington, 1<sup>st</sup> President of the United States of America</p>
<p> </p>
<p><b><u>“COMMERCIAL LAW”</u></b> (Contract Law) provides for various <b><u>PUBLIC COMMERCIAL TAX REBATE LIENS</u> TO COMBAT <u>MAL-PROCESS</u>, <u>MALFEASCEANCE</u>, and <u>Misprision</u> of felony <u>VALUED BY REFERENCE TO VARIOUS SECTIONS OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE</u></b> to be used to make collection for Civil Rights damages on behalf of the Public caused by the Defendant (Debtor).</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Criminal Complaints being used are being evaluated by an application of 1976 values of 18 USC §§ 241 & 242. These 1976 values are not inflated in these Criminal Complaints. Therefore, no one can complain that they are excessive.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>If the IRS, which is a Private Entity, can use Commercial Law every day to make collections by <b><u>illegally</u></b> using a <u>NOTICE OF LIEN</u>, then every Private Citizen may utilize Commercial Law to provide for Remedy against Civil Rights violations and make collections for damages by proper use of <u>NOTICE OF LIEN</u> followed by <u>ACTUAL LIEN</u> upon expiration of the three months (Jewish/International Commercial Law) (Statutory 90-day) grace period.</p>
<p> </p>
<p align="center"><b>FOLLOWING ARE THE OPTIONS OF “DUE PROCESS OF LAW” LEFT TO DEFENDANT (DEBTOR) UPON <u>DISHONOR, RIDICULE, AND CONTEMPT FOR PROCESS</u> BY FEDERAL JUDGES AND U.S. PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS</b></p>
<p align="center"><b> </b></p>
<p>Defendant (Debtor) now <u>must</u> <u>personally</u> <u>respond</u> by <u>sworn</u> <u>Counter-Affidavit</u> <u>properly</u> <u>rebutting</u> <b><u>each</u> <u>charge</u> <u>point-by-point</u></b> showing “Just Cause” Specifically why the Criminal Charges are not true, correct, complete, and not misleading, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, if such be the case.</p>
<p> </p>
<div><p>If Defendant (Debtor) refuses and/or fails to respond as such, then Defendant (Debtor) has waived and given up their opportunity to utilize “Due Process of Law,” in their own behalf, and has agreed to the terms so stated in the Criminal Complaint by their Dishonor of the Commercial Process.</p>
<p> </p>
</div>
<p> </p>
<p>If Defendant (Debtor) responds, but fails to respond by sworn Affidavit specifically stating their Counter-Affidavit is true, correct, complete, and not misleading, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, it shall be considered a Non-response, Dishonor, and Default.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The burden of the proof of the Criminal Charges and follow up Lien(s) rests on the Affiant/Accuser/Lien Claimant, unless the Defendant/Debtor gives up/abandons or fails to contest the charges/claims. The Basic Rule is: He who leaves the Battle first, loses by Default.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Please understand that the Affiant/Accuser/Lien Claimant would prefer that the Defendant/ Debtor would be Innocent. These Processes have not been created for personal gain, but have been instituted for the Peace and Dignity of the Public.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Commercial values are established by reference to the United States Code Law Title 18 (U.S.C./ USC), and, consequently, are Commercial Instruments of value, therefore, making them <u>OBLIGATIONS OF VALUE</u> known as SECURITIES. Such Commercial Securities Instruments are governed by Title 15 United States Code, and overseen by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (U.S.S.E.C./USSEC).</p>
<div><p> </p>
</div>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>If any Judge, Public Official, and/or Military Officer(s) believes any of this Commercial Process to be False, said Judge, Public Official, and/or Military Officer(s) is required by their own respective government systems to produce Affidavit(s) specifically showing “Just Cause” with Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law to support their Specific disagreement claims, and these Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law must be sworn to be true, correct, materially complete, and not misleading, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, and be available for Public Inspection by the Court of Public opinion of the people/Citizens of this Nation. Anything less shall be considered a Non-Response, Dishonor, and Default on the part of the Judge, Public Official, and/or Military Officer(s), and an evasion of Due Process.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Respond to:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Randy Due --Ex military (Civil Rights Advocate) Non-union Lawyer pursuant to 42 USC 1986</p>
<p>179 Green St. E.</p>
<p>Pelham, Georgia 31779</p>
<p> </p>
<p>(229) 294-6112</p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="mailto:duze24@bellsouth.net">duze24@bellsouth.net</a> September 22, 2012</p> PUBLIC NOTICE TO THE MILITARYtag:wesurroundthemcentrecounty.ning.com,2012-09-22:3029713:Topic:482582012-09-22T01:56:12.197ZRandy Duehttps://wesurroundthemcentrecounty.ning.com/profile/RandyDue
<p>PUBLIC NOTICE TO THE MILITARY & CIVIL AUTHORITY</p>
<p align="center"><b><u> </u></b></p>
<h4>MILITARY DUTY TO PROTECT CITIZENS’ CIVIL RIGHTS</h4>
<p align="center"><b> </b></p>
<p>All True Americans believe: ---- “We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are ---created equal, that they are endowed by their ---Creator,” ---<b>The Declaration of Independence</b><b>---</b></p>
<p> </p>
<div><p>Domestic Enemies of our Freedoms ---want to destroy these Simple…</p>
</div>
<p>PUBLIC NOTICE TO THE MILITARY & CIVIL AUTHORITY</p>
<p align="center"><b><u> </u></b></p>
<h4>MILITARY DUTY TO PROTECT CITIZENS’ CIVIL RIGHTS</h4>
<p align="center"><b> </b></p>
<p>All True Americans believe: ---- “We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are ---created equal, that they are endowed by their ---Creator,” ---<b>The Declaration of Independence</b><b>---</b></p>
<p> </p>
<div><p>Domestic Enemies of our Freedoms ---want to destroy these Simple Truths.</p>
</div>
<p> </p>
<p>Who is a Domestic Enemy?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Anyone who would take the <b>Freedoms, Rights</b> and <b>Liberties</b> from the <b>American People</b> is a ---<b>Domestic Enemy.</b></p>
<h1><b><u> </u></b></h1>
<p>MILITARY OATH: Title 5 USC section 3331</p>
<p> </p>
<p>“I, _________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will <b><u>support and defend</u></b> the Constitution of the United States <b>against all enemies,</b> foreign <b>and</b> <b><u>domestic;</u></b> that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”</p>
<p> </p>
<h2>10 USC Chapter 47 - UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE</h2>
<h3>10 USC § 821 - Art. 21. Jurisdiction of courts-martial not exclusive</h3>
<h1>The provisions of this chapter conferring jurisdiction upon courts-martial <b><u>do not deprive</u> military commissions, provost courts, or other military tribunals of concurrent jurisdiction with respect to offenders or offenses <u>that by statute</u></b> <b>(Inserted Note:</b> <u>18 USC § 4 is the statue mandating compliance of the military to apprehend and prosecute public officials who have become domestic enemies by violation of their required Constitutional Oaths and Civil Rights violations against Citizens</u><b>)</b> or by the law of war may be tried by military commissions, provost courts, or other military tribunals.</h1>
<h2>10 USC § 904 - Art. 104. Aiding the enemy</h2>
<p><b>Any person who—</b></p>
<p>(1) <b>aids, or attempts to aid, the enemy</b> with arms, ammunition, supplies, money, <b>or other things;</b> or</p>
<p>(2) <b>without proper authority,</b> knowingly harbors or protects or gives intelligence to, or communicates or corresponds with <b>or holds any intercourse with the enemy, either directly or indirectly;</b></p>
<p>shall suffer death or such other punishment as a court-martial or military commission may direct.</p>
<h2> </h2>
<h2>10 USC § 948d - Jurisdiction of military commissions</h2>
<p>A military commission under this chapter <b><u>shall have jurisdiction</u></b> to try persons subject to this chapter for any offense made punishable by this chapter…</p>
<p> </p>
<p>18 USC § 4 IS THE CRIMINAL STATUTE THAT MANDATES THE MILITARY TO PROTECT CITIZENS FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS VIOLATING CITIZENS’ CIVIL RIGHTS WHEN THE CIVIL AUTHORTY REFUSES TO PROTECT</p>
<p> </p>
<p><b>18 USC § 4</b> <b>Misprision of Felony:</b> Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or <b><u>military authority under the United States,</u></b> shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><b>18 USC § 1385 - Use of Army and Air Force as posse comitatus</b></p>
<p>Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly <b>authorized by the Constitution</b> <b>or Act of Congress,</b> willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both. <b>(Note: <u>18 USC § 4</u> is the act of congress that Mandates the Military to support Private Citizens to apprehend and Criminally Prosecute Public Officials who have become Domestic Enemies by virtue of taking away our Freedoms and violating our Civil Rights)</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p><b>18 USC § 241 Conspiracy Against Rights</b></p>
<p>This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons <b>to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person</b> of any state, territory or district <b>in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same).</b><br/><br/></p>
<p><b>18 USC § 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law</b></p>
<p><b>This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S.<br/><br/></b></p>
<p><b>Acts under "color of any law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials</b> within the bounds or limits of their lawful authority, but also acts done without and beyond the bounds of their lawful authority; provided that, in order for unlawful acts of any official to be done under "color of any law," the unlawful acts must be done while such official is purporting or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. <b>This definition includes, in addition to law enforcement officials, individuals such as Mayors, Council persons, Judges, Nursing Home Proprietors, Security Guards, etc., persons who are bound by laws, statutes ordinances, or customs.</b><br/><br/></p>
<h2>18 USC § 2381 - Treason</h2>
<p>Whoever, <b>owing allegiance to the United States</b>, levies war against them or <b>adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States</b> or elsewhere, <b>is guilty of treason and shall suffer death,</b> or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; <b>and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.</b></p>
<h2>18 USC § 2382 - Misprision of treason</h2>
<p>Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.</p>
<p> </p>
<h2>18 USC § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection</h2>
<p>Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection <b>against the <u>authority</u> of the United States or the laws thereof</b>, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and <b>shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.</b></p>
<p><b> </b></p>
<p><b> </b></p>
<h4>AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES</h4>
<p align="center"><b>IS</b></p>
<p align="center"><b>THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA</b></p>
<p align="center"><b>AND IT IS</b></p>
<h6>THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND</h6>
<p align="center"><b> </b></p>
<p>"This <b><u>constitution</u></b> shall be the <b>Supreme Law of the Land</b>; and the <b>judges in every state shall be bound thereby</b>, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding." (U.S. Constitution, Article VI, paragraph 2.)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>THE MILITARY OATH REQUIRES ALL MILITARY PEOPLE TO SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AGAINST <u>ALL ENEMIES</u></p>
<h4>OR</h4>
<div><p align="center"><b>FACE CHARGES OF <u>TREASON</u></b></p>
</div>
<p align="center"><b><u> </u></b></p>
<p align="center"><b><u>DEMAND UPON THE MILITARY & CIVIL AUTHORITY</u></b></p>
<p align="center"><b><u> </u></b></p>
<p>Should you disagree with these Military codes and Title 18 Criminal Laws; I, Randy Due (Public Civil Rights Advocate) immediately request you to show “Just Cause” of Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law by sworn Affidavit that your claims are true, correct, complete, and not misleading, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Reply to:</p>
<p>Randy Due; Ex Military & (Civil Rights Advocate) Non-union Lawyer pursuant to 42 USC 1986</p>
<p>179 Green St. E.</p>
<p>Pelham, Georgia 31779</p>
<p>(229) 294-6112</p>
<p><a href="mailto:duze24@bellsouth.net">duze24@bellsouth.net</a></p>